1. Questions that reveal real maritime experience: why the interview decides your case
You are not choosing a personality, you are choosing a practice. The questions that reveal real maritime experience test four things: whether the lawyer can name the law that covers you and explain why, whether the firm has recent and comparable case history, whether it works in federal court as a matter of routine, and whether it will move on evidence in the first week rather than the first month.
Maritime injury law is a specialty inside a specialty. The same accident can fall under the Jones Act, the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act, the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, or the Death on the High Seas Act, and each one carries a different deadline, a different decision-maker, and a different measure of damages. A general personal injury firm can be excellent at car crashes and still be a year behind on your case, because the first decision, which system applies, has to be right before anything else can be.
Treat the free consultation as a two-way interview. You are allowed to ask hard questions, and a firm that resents them is telling you something useful. Our companion guide on how to vet a maritime injury attorney covers the paperwork side of the check, including bar standing and federal court admission, and our overview of how to choose a maritime injury lawyer explains how to weigh specialty against convenience when the best firm is not the closest one.
Bottom line: The interview is the cheapest protection you have. Specific questions produce specific answers, and specific answers are what distinguish a maritime practice from a firm that will learn on your file.
2. Questions about your legal status
Start here, because everything else follows from it. Ask the lawyer which law covers your injury and why, then listen for whether the answer is tied to your facts: the structure you were on, what your job contributed to, how much of your time was spent aboard a vessel, and who employed you versus who controlled the worksite.
A lawyer who handles these cases will not need to look up the framework. Seaman status requires duties contributing to the function of a vessel in navigation, plus a connection to that vessel or an identifiable fleet that is substantial in both duration and nature. Courts commonly use roughly 30 percent of work time aboard as a guidepost rather than a rule, and the analysis looks at your whole work history rather than the day you were hurt.
A seaman injured in the course of employment may elect to bring a civil action at law, with the right of trial by jury, against the employer.
- Which statute do you think covers me, and why? A specific answer tied to your facts, not a promise to figure it out later.
- How is seaman status tested? Duties, plus a substantial connection in duration and nature, with the 30 percent guidepost explained rather than recited.
- What happens if my employer says I am not a seaman? Status is a fact question, and a company form does not settle it.
- Could two systems apply at once? Shelf work, tender operations, and split assignments often raise exactly that question.
- Who else could be responsible besides my employer? Vessel owners, platform operators, contractors, and equipment makers are frequently in the picture.
Bottom line: If the lawyer cannot describe the status test in plain language on the first call, that lawyer has not litigated it. This is the single most revealing question in the interview.
3. Questions about actual case history
Ask for numbers with dates attached. How many maritime cases has the firm filed in the last three years, how many involved an injury and an employer like yours, how many went to trial or arbitration, and how many were referred out to another firm. Recent and comparable beats impressive and old.
Marketing language is easy. Case history is not. A firm that handles maritime work continuously will be able to describe representative matters in general terms without hesitating: the type of vessel or structure, the mechanism of injury, the defenses raised, and how the case resolved. A firm that mostly advertises will answer with adjectives, or will describe a single memorable result from a decade ago.
- How many maritime cases have you filed in the last three years? Filed is the operative word, because intake volume is not experience.
- How many were like mine? Same category of vessel or structure, same kind of injury, same type of employer.
- How many did you try? Settlement is usually the right outcome, but trial capability is what moves settlement value.
- Do you refer maritime cases out? If so, ask to whom, and how the fee is divided.
- Have you handled a case against my employer or its insurer before? Familiarity with the other side's playbook is real experience.
Verification is possible without taking anyone's word for it. Our guide to checking a maritime lawyer's track record walks through public dockets, bar records, and reported decisions, and the companion piece on questions to ask lawyers about maritime case experience gives you the exact phrasing to use if the first answers are vague.
Bottom line: Ask for recent, comparable, completed work. Three years, similar facts, and a clear account of what happened at the end of the case.
4. Questions about federal court and venue
Ask which federal districts the firm is admitted in and appears in regularly, and how it approaches admiralty procedure. Serious maritime injury cases are usually litigated in federal court or under federal maritime law in state court, and the procedural choices made in the first month shape the rest of the case.
This is where a general practice most often gets caught. Admiralty has its own jurisdictional statute, its own pleading election, and its own defense mechanism in the form of a shipowner limitation of liability proceeding. Whether to plead a Jones Act claim to a jury, whether to elect admiralty for related claims, and how to respond when a vessel owner files a limitation action are decisions that require experience rather than research.
The district courts have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of any civil case of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction, saving to suitors in all cases all other remedies to which they are otherwise entitled.
- Which federal courts are you admitted in? Admission is a document, not an opinion, and it can be confirmed.
- Where would you file my case, and why? Venue affects the jury pool, the applicable circuit law, and the timeline.
- How do you handle a limitation of liability action? If a vessel owner files one, the case changes shape quickly.
- Will you demand a jury? A Jones Act claim carries a jury right, and the pleading choices matter.
- Which circuit's law governs, and does it help or hurt me? Maritime law is not uniform across circuits on every issue.
If the answers here are thin, the specialty question is settled. Our comparison of a maritime specialist versus a general personal injury firm lays out what the difference costs in practice, from the discovery plan to the experts the case actually needs.
Bottom line: Federal court fluency is not optional in maritime work. Ask about districts, venue strategy, jury elections, and limitation actions, and listen for routine rather than research.