No Out-of-Pocket Costs Free Case Reviews Confidential & Independent
Legal Help · Choosing a Lawyer

Questions That Reveal Real Maritime Experience

Every firm with a website says it handles maritime cases. Ten minutes of the right questions tells you whether that is true. These are the questions that reveal real maritime experience, and the answers that should send you somewhere else.

By Michael Mangione, Editor · Last reviewed: August 13, 2026 · 12 min read
Vetted maritime attorneys Confidential No out-of-pocket cost

What you are actually testing

Four things separate a maritime practice from a firm that takes maritime calls.

Command of the Law
Names the statute. Can the lawyer say which system covers you, and why, on your facts?
Recent Case History
Filed, not just fielded. Maritime cases actually filed and worked in the last three years.
Federal Court Habits
Admiralty is different. Districts, Rule 9(h) elections, and limitation actions are routine or they are not.
Early Preservation
Records move fast. A real practice demands logs and reports in the first week, not the first month.
Editorial content, not legal advice. This guide explains how to evaluate a lawyer's maritime experience in general terms. It does not endorse any firm, does not predict outcomes, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Rules of professional conduct and fee limits vary by state. Free case review →
Key Takeaways
  • The questions that reveal real maritime experience are specific, not general: which law covers you, what your deadline is, what gets preserved this week, and who tries the case.
  • A maritime lawyer should be able to explain seaman status and the roughly 30 percent connection guidepost in plain language, without looking it up.
  • Ask for recent and comparable case history, in the last three years, with the same category of employer, vessel, or platform.
  • Federal court and admiralty procedure matter, including Rule 9(h) elections and shipowner limitation of liability actions.
  • Get the fee, the cost treatment, the referral possibility, and the name of the lawyer who will handle your file in writing before you sign anything.
8 Question sets that expose
real maritime experience
30 Days, the usual written
notice window on the docks
3 Years, the usual Jones
Act filing deadline
30% Rough guidepost for
vessel-connected time
A quiet law library with rows of bound volumes, representing the legal research behind a maritime injury case
The Interview

Ten minutes tells you a lot.

1. Questions that reveal real maritime experience: why the interview decides your case

Quick Answer

You are not choosing a personality, you are choosing a practice. The questions that reveal real maritime experience test four things: whether the lawyer can name the law that covers you and explain why, whether the firm has recent and comparable case history, whether it works in federal court as a matter of routine, and whether it will move on evidence in the first week rather than the first month.

Maritime injury law is a specialty inside a specialty. The same accident can fall under the Jones Act, the Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act, the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, or the Death on the High Seas Act, and each one carries a different deadline, a different decision-maker, and a different measure of damages. A general personal injury firm can be excellent at car crashes and still be a year behind on your case, because the first decision, which system applies, has to be right before anything else can be.

Why It Matters First Call

Most of the damage in a weak maritime case happens in the first thirty days, before anyone has filed anything. That is why the interview is not a formality.

Treat the free consultation as a two-way interview. You are allowed to ask hard questions, and a firm that resents them is telling you something useful. Our companion guide on how to vet a maritime injury attorney covers the paperwork side of the check, including bar standing and federal court admission, and our overview of how to choose a maritime injury lawyer explains how to weigh specialty against convenience when the best firm is not the closest one.

Bottom line: The interview is the cheapest protection you have. Specific questions produce specific answers, and specific answers are what distinguish a maritime practice from a firm that will learn on your file.

An open statute book on a desk beside a notepad, representing the legal rules that decide which system covers an injured maritime worker
Your Status

Which system covers you?

2. Questions about your legal status

Quick Answer

Start here, because everything else follows from it. Ask the lawyer which law covers your injury and why, then listen for whether the answer is tied to your facts: the structure you were on, what your job contributed to, how much of your time was spent aboard a vessel, and who employed you versus who controlled the worksite.

A lawyer who handles these cases will not need to look up the framework. Seaman status requires duties contributing to the function of a vessel in navigation, plus a connection to that vessel or an identifiable fleet that is substantial in both duration and nature. Courts commonly use roughly 30 percent of work time aboard as a guidepost rather than a rule, and the analysis looks at your whole work history rather than the day you were hurt.

The Seaman's Statute

A seaman injured in the course of employment may elect to bring a civil action at law, with the right of trial by jury, against the employer.

46 U.S.C. § 30104, the Jones Act

  • Which statute do you think covers me, and why? A specific answer tied to your facts, not a promise to figure it out later.
  • How is seaman status tested? Duties, plus a substantial connection in duration and nature, with the 30 percent guidepost explained rather than recited.
  • What happens if my employer says I am not a seaman? Status is a fact question, and a company form does not settle it.
  • Could two systems apply at once? Shelf work, tender operations, and split assignments often raise exactly that question.
  • Who else could be responsible besides my employer? Vessel owners, platform operators, contractors, and equipment makers are frequently in the picture.

Bottom line: If the lawyer cannot describe the status test in plain language on the first call, that lawyer has not litigated it. This is the single most revealing question in the interview.

A wall of legal case reporters and archive files, representing a law firm's documented case history
Track Record

Filed, tried, resolved.

3. Questions about actual case history

Quick Answer

Ask for numbers with dates attached. How many maritime cases has the firm filed in the last three years, how many involved an injury and an employer like yours, how many went to trial or arbitration, and how many were referred out to another firm. Recent and comparable beats impressive and old.

Marketing language is easy. Case history is not. A firm that handles maritime work continuously will be able to describe representative matters in general terms without hesitating: the type of vessel or structure, the mechanism of injury, the defenses raised, and how the case resolved. A firm that mostly advertises will answer with adjectives, or will describe a single memorable result from a decade ago.

  • How many maritime cases have you filed in the last three years? Filed is the operative word, because intake volume is not experience.
  • How many were like mine? Same category of vessel or structure, same kind of injury, same type of employer.
  • How many did you try? Settlement is usually the right outcome, but trial capability is what moves settlement value.
  • Do you refer maritime cases out? If so, ask to whom, and how the fee is divided.
  • Have you handled a case against my employer or its insurer before? Familiarity with the other side's playbook is real experience.

Verification is possible without taking anyone's word for it. Our guide to checking a maritime lawyer's track record walks through public dockets, bar records, and reported decisions, and the companion piece on questions to ask lawyers about maritime case experience gives you the exact phrasing to use if the first answers are vague.

Bottom line: Ask for recent, comparable, completed work. Three years, similar facts, and a clear account of what happened at the end of the case.

The exterior columns of a federal courthouse, representing admiralty litigation in federal court
Federal Court

Admiralty is its own world.

4. Questions about federal court and venue

Quick Answer

Ask which federal districts the firm is admitted in and appears in regularly, and how it approaches admiralty procedure. Serious maritime injury cases are usually litigated in federal court or under federal maritime law in state court, and the procedural choices made in the first month shape the rest of the case.

This is where a general practice most often gets caught. Admiralty has its own jurisdictional statute, its own pleading election, and its own defense mechanism in the form of a shipowner limitation of liability proceeding. Whether to plead a Jones Act claim to a jury, whether to elect admiralty for related claims, and how to respond when a vessel owner files a limitation action are decisions that require experience rather than research.

Admiralty Jurisdiction

The district courts have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of any civil case of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction, saving to suitors in all cases all other remedies to which they are otherwise entitled.

28 U.S.C. § 1333, admiralty and maritime jurisdiction

  • Which federal courts are you admitted in? Admission is a document, not an opinion, and it can be confirmed.
  • Where would you file my case, and why? Venue affects the jury pool, the applicable circuit law, and the timeline.
  • How do you handle a limitation of liability action? If a vessel owner files one, the case changes shape quickly.
  • Will you demand a jury? A Jones Act claim carries a jury right, and the pleading choices matter.
  • Which circuit's law governs, and does it help or hurt me? Maritime law is not uniform across circuits on every issue.

If the answers here are thin, the specialty question is settled. Our comparison of a maritime specialist versus a general personal injury firm lays out what the difference costs in practice, from the discovery plan to the experts the case actually needs.

Bottom line: Federal court fluency is not optional in maritime work. Ask about districts, venue strategy, jury elections, and limitation actions, and listen for routine rather than research.

Not sure the firm on the phone has done this before?

A free, confidential review routes you to a vetted maritime attorney who can answer these questions on your facts, with no obligation and no out-of-pocket cost.

Talk To A Vetted Attorney →
A wall clock beside legal documents, representing filing deadlines in a maritime injury claim
The Clock

Ask for your date.

5. Questions about deadlines and notice

Quick Answer

Ask the lawyer to tell you, during the meeting, which notice period and filing deadline apply to you and what calendar dates they fall on. A maritime practice can do that from the facts you just described. A firm that has to research it before answering is not yet protecting the clock.

The deadlines are not interchangeable. Jones Act and general maritime injury claims generally run three years from the injury. Longshore compensation practice runs on much shorter timelines, including a written notice requirement measured in days and a claim filing period measured in a year. Death cases on the high seas, claims against government vessels, and cruise passenger claims governed by ticket contracts each carry their own limits, some of them very short.

The Compensation Clock

The right to compensation for disability or death is barred unless a claim is filed within one year after the injury or death.

33 U.S.C. § 913, time for filing of claims

  • What is my deadline, and what date is it? Not a range, a date, with the statute it comes from.
  • Do I owe anyone written notice, and by when? Compensation notice periods are measured in days, not years.
  • What happens if my status is disputed? Until it is resolved, the shortest applicable deadline is the safe assumption.
  • Is there a contract that shortens my time? Ticket contracts and some agreements impose shorter notice and suit limits.
  • What are you doing this week to protect the deadline? The answer should be concrete.
Do Not Wait For A Determination

Waiting for an employer or insurer to decide which system covers you can consume the time you had to file. Notice given early costs nothing and preserves options. A lawyer who tells you to wait and see is not managing risk.

Bottom line: A real maritime practice puts a date on your claim during the first conversation and tells you what is being done this week to protect it.

A stack of technical reports and binders on a desk, representing vessel logs and maintenance records preserved as evidence
Preservation

What moves this week?

6. Questions about offshore evidence

Quick Answer

Ask what will be demanded immediately. Real maritime practice starts with preservation: a litigation hold letter to the employer and vessel owner, then requests for the vessel or rig logs, daily reports, safety meeting records, maintenance and work-order history, crew lists, transport manifests, the incident report, and any photographs or video.

Offshore evidence disappears in ordinary course. Equipment is repaired, vessels sail, crews rotate, digital records cycle out on retention schedules, and witnesses move to other contracts. That is not necessarily bad faith, but the effect is the same: the proof of what actually happened thins out every week. A firm that treats a maritime injury like a slip and fall will start requesting documents after the pleadings, by which point the useful material is often gone.

  • What preservation letter goes out, and when? Ideally within days, to the employer, the vessel owner, and any contractor involved.
  • Which records will you demand first? Logs, daily reports, JSAs and safety meetings, maintenance and work orders, crew lists, and the incident report.
  • Who inspects the equipment or vessel? Marine engineers and safety experts, and who pays for them.
  • How do you handle a maintenance and cure fight? Ask what Atlantic Sounding Co. v. Townsend means when an employer simply stops paying.
  • Who takes the crew statements, and how soon? Rotations end, and memories and contact details go with them.
Why Speed Beats Eloquence

Cases are usually won by documents nobody wanted to hand over. The firm that sends the hold letter in week one and the records demand in week two will end up with a better case than the more persuasive firm that starts in month three.

Bottom line: Ask what gets preserved this week, in writing, by name. Early preservation is the clearest sign that a firm has done this work before.

A signed contract and pen on a wooden desk, representing a written contingency fee agreement
Fees and Staffing

Who actually does the work?

7. Questions about fees, costs, and who does the work

Quick Answer

Ask for the contingency percentage in writing, whether it changes if the case is filed or tried, how case costs are handled, whether costs come out before or after the fee is calculated, what you owe if the case is lost, and whether the file may be referred or co-counseled. Then ask which lawyer will actually handle and try your case.

Fee terms are not a detail. On a serious offshore claim, the difference between cost treatments can be tens of thousands of dollars, and a referral arrangement can mean the lawyer you interviewed never touches the file again. None of this is improper when it is disclosed in writing, and the rules of professional conduct in every state require that the fee basis be communicated clearly. The problem is silence, not structure.

  • What is the fee, in writing? Percentage, and whether it increases at filing, arbitration, or trial.
  • How are costs handled? Experts, depositions, and records, and whether they are deducted before or after the fee.
  • What do I owe if we lose? Get the answer in the agreement, not just in conversation.
  • Will this case be referred? If it may be, ask to whom and how the fee is split.
  • Who is my lawyer, day to day, and who tries the case? Names, not a department.
  • How are liens and benefits already paid handled at the end? Medical liens and compensation offsets change what you actually receive.

Written terms are also a documentation check, which is why our guide on vetting a maritime injury attorney treats a clear fee agreement, verified bar standing, and federal court admission as one package rather than three separate boxes.

Bottom line: Fees, costs, referral, and staffing all belong in writing before you sign. A firm that explains them plainly is showing you how it will communicate later.

A single reading lamp lighting an open book in a dim library, representing careful review before choosing a lawyer
Red Flags

What a weak answer sounds like.

8. Answers that should worry you

Quick Answer

Guarantees about value, pressure to sign on the first call, no written fee agreement, an inability to name the law that covers you, treating a maritime injury as an ordinary workplace accident, no preservation plan, and refusal to say who will handle the file. Any one of these is a reason to keep interviewing.

None of these are close calls, and you do not need legal training to spot them. Notice also the softer version: a lawyer who agrees with everything you say, never asks what your job actually involved, never asks how much of your time was spent aboard a vessel, and never asks who else was on the worksite. Good maritime intake is full of questions back at you, because status and liability both depend on details you have not thought to mention.

  • Promised numbers. No one can value a claim before the medical picture and the liability facts are developed.
  • Sign today. Urgency about your signature is not the same as urgency about your deadline.
  • Nothing in writing. No fee agreement, no scope, no engagement letter.
  • The employer's label accepted. A form that says you are not a seaman is a position, not a ruling.
  • No questions back. If nobody asks about your vessel time, your duties, or the contractors on site, nobody is analyzing your case.
  • Unclear staffing. If the person who will handle your file cannot be named, assume it is not the person in front of you.

If you would rather work from a printed list than improvise, our set of maritime lawyer interview questions is organized in the same order as this guide, and a free case review is a no-obligation way to have your status and deadline analyzed before you commit to anyone.

Want these questions answered on your facts? A free, confidential review connects you with a vetted maritime attorney who can name your statute, your deadline, and the records that need preserving. No obligation, no out-of-pocket cost.
Get a Free Review →

Bottom line: Weak answers are easy to recognize once you know the pattern. Keep interviewing until a firm answers in statutes, dates, records, and names.

For Verification

Sources & Authorities

The rules a maritime lawyer should know cold come from federal statutes, the federal rules, and Supreme Court decisions. Every source below is free to read and verify.

Statutes & Rules

Supreme Court Decisions

Editorial standard: This guide is reviewed periodically and updated when the governing statutes, rules, or controlling decisions change. Last reviewed August 13, 2026, by Michael Mangione, Editor. This article is educational information, not legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed. Fee rules and rules of professional conduct vary by state, and nothing here is an endorsement of any firm or a prediction about any case.

Behind This Article

Our Editorial Standards

How this guide is researched, reviewed, and kept current. Transparency about what we are and what we are not.

01

Primary sources only

Every legal rule in this article cites a primary federal source: the U.S. Code, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or Supreme Court opinions. All citations link to free public databases (Cornell Law Legal Information Institute and Justia). You can verify everything we say.

02

Quarterly review

This guide is reviewed every quarter and updated whenever the governing rules change. Our editor tracks the seaman status decisions, longshore notice and filing periods, and the fee-disclosure standards that shape what an injured worker should ask before hiring counsel. The Last reviewed date at the top reflects the most recent pass.

03

Editorial, not legal advice

Our editor is not a practicing attorney. This guide is researched journalism about how to evaluate maritime legal experience, not legal advice about your situation and not a prediction about any case, and no attorney-client relationship is formed. For your specific situation, talk to a licensed maritime attorney through our free case review.

04

How we vet attorneys

Attorneys in our network are vetted before we connect you: maritime specialty concentration, federal court admission, documented maritime trial experience, current state bar standing, and clear contingency-fee disclosure. We do not refer to generalist personal injury lawyers.

Michael Mangione, editor of Offshore Injury Help and founder of The Mangione Group, headshot

About the Editor

Michael Mangione

Michael is the founder of The Mangione Group, a specialty legal-services firm focused on attorney intake, lead qualification, and connecting injured workers with vetted specialty attorneys. He has spent years screening law firms for maritime, nursing home abuse, and trucking cases, which means he has heard thousands of intake calls from both sides. He is not a practicing attorney. His expertise is in the editorial side of legal information and the operational side of how injured offshore workers find the right legal help, which is exactly what this guide is about.

LinkedIn · The Mangione Group

Last reviewed: August 13, 2026 (initial publication, comprehensive review against 46 U.S.C. sections 30104 and 30106, 33 U.S.C. sections 912 and 913, 43 U.S.C. section 1333, 28 U.S.C. section 1333, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(h), and the Supreme Court decisions in Chandris, Papai, Stewart, Atlantic Sounding, Miles, and Lewis). Next review: November 2026 or sooner upon material developments.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about testing a maritime lawyer's experience

Educational information only. Nothing here is legal advice, an endorsement of any firm, or a prediction about any case, and no attorney-client relationship is formed. For your situation, connect with a vetted maritime attorney through the free case review above.

What are the questions that reveal real maritime experience? +
The most revealing questions are specific rather than general. Ask which law the lawyer thinks covers you and why, how seaman status is tested, what the filing deadline is on your facts, how many maritime cases the firm has filed in federal court in the last three years, who preserves the vessel and rig records, whether the case will be tried by the lawyer you are speaking to, and how costs are handled if you lose. A lawyer who lives in this area answers in specifics, statutes, and case names without hesitating.
Is it rude to interview a lawyer before hiring them? +
No. A case review is a two-way interview, and experienced maritime lawyers expect it. You are choosing who will control a claim that may be the only compensation you receive for a career-ending injury. Reputable firms answer direct questions about experience, deadlines, staffing, and fees, and they put the fee agreement in writing. If a lawyer treats reasonable questions as an insult or rushes you to sign, that reaction is itself information.
What should a maritime lawyer know about seaman status? +
A maritime lawyer should be able to explain, without notes, that seaman status requires duties contributing to the function of a vessel in navigation plus a connection to that vessel or an identifiable fleet that is substantial in duration and nature, and that courts often use roughly 30 percent of work time aboard as a guidepost rather than a rule. The Supreme Court decisions behind that framework include Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis and Harbor Tug and Barge Co. v. Papai. A lawyer who cannot describe the test in plain language has not litigated it.
How many maritime cases should a lawyer have handled? +
There is no magic number, and volume alone proves nothing. What matters is recent, relevant, and completed work: maritime cases filed in the last three years, injuries similar to yours, the same category of employer or vessel, and outcomes the lawyer can describe in general terms. Ask how many were resolved by trial or arbitration rather than early settlement. A firm that files one maritime case a year is learning on your claim.
Why does federal court experience matter in a maritime case? +
Most serious maritime injury cases are litigated in federal court or under federal maritime law in state court, and the procedure is unusual. Admiralty jurisdiction, Rule 9(h) elections, limitation of liability proceedings, and the interplay between the saving to suitors clause and a shipowner limitation action all change strategy. Ask for the districts the firm is admitted in and appears in regularly. A lawyer who has never filed an admiralty case will be learning the rules while your deadline runs.
What should I ask about deadlines? +
Ask the lawyer to tell you, in the meeting, which deadline applies to you and what date it falls on. Jones Act and general maritime injury claims generally run three years from the injury. Longshore compensation practice runs on much shorter clocks, including a written notice period measured in days. Death cases on the high seas and claims involving government vessels have their own limits. A lawyer who cannot identify your clock on the first call is not ready to protect it.
What should I ask about how my case will be investigated? +
Ask what will be requested this week. Real maritime practice moves early on preservation: a litigation hold letter to the employer, requests for the vessel log, the daily reports, the safety meeting records, the maintenance and work-order history, the crew list, the incident report, and any photographs or video. Ask whether the firm uses marine engineers, vocational experts, and economists, and who pays for them. Vague answers about gathering records later usually mean nothing will be preserved.
What fee questions should I ask? +
Ask for the contingency percentage in writing, whether it changes if the case is filed or tried, how case costs are handled, whether costs are deducted before or after the fee is calculated, and what you owe if the case is lost. Ask whether the case may be referred or co-counseled with another firm and how that affects the total fee. Ask how medical liens and any compensation benefits already paid will be handled at the end.
What answers are red flags? +
Guarantees about value, pressure to sign on the first call, no written fee agreement, an inability to name the law that covers you, treating your claim as an ordinary workplace injury, no plan to preserve vessel records, and refusal to say who will actually handle the file. Another warning sign is a lawyer who says the classification your employer wrote on a form settles the question. Status is a fact question, and it is often contested successfully.

Get your questions answered before you sign anything.

No obligation. No out-of-pocket cost. Reviewed by our editor and routed to a licensed maritime attorney who can name the law that covers you, the deadline you are working against, and the records that need to be preserved now.

Get a Free Case Review →

Vetted network · Independent · National coverage